Google Launches Online LGBTQ+ Glossary But Forgets To Include “Bisexual”

A new online tool designed to help mainstream, freelance, and even LGBTQ+ journalists navigate definitions of what can be a complex world of LGBTQ+ vernacular, left out definitions of bisexuality and pansexuality in a new Google LGBTQ+ language initiative.

The Google News Initiative announced last week in a press statement the project in partnership with VideoOut, titled the “LGBTQ+ language and media literacy program.". According to the company, they partnered with Men’s Health magazine to “help contextualize the research and data in the program.”

However, as the Los Angeles Blade writes, in a review of the glossary on 26 November, the terms and definitions for bisexuality and pansexuality were missing.

According to the Google release: “It’s a way to understand the LGBTQ+ community, and hopefully, it will transform the way journalists – and all of us – write and talk about LGBTQ+ people.”

Jordan Reeves, the Executive Director of VideoOut, an LGBTQ+ non-profit and the founder of VOE, a production company centering LGBTQ+ narratives in television and film, answered the self-asked question of “Why would VideoOut, an LGBTQ+ non-profit, partner with Men’s Health magazine?”

“So many people assume that Men’s Health is only for cisgender, heterosexual, masculine presenting men. I’m here to tell you, as a queer trans nonbinary human, that’s false.”

According to a recent Gallup poll, “One in six [US] adults in Generation Z identifies as LGBT.” At the same time, a GLAAD report found 45% of non-LGBTQ+ people in the US say they’re confused by the different number of terms to describe individuals who comprise the LGBTQ+ community.

In a response late Friday evening, a spokesperson for Jordan Reeves in a direct message on Twitter gave the Blade a statement from Reeves:

“Recently we launched The LGBTQ+ Language and Media Literacy Program, a living and breathing resource that we will continue to add to over time. We left out some terms and phrases at launch — bisexual, for example — that should have been included from the very beginning!

We are keenly aware of bi-erasure and the persistent confusion around bisexual identity. We are sorry we didn’t include it at luanch [sic], but we are adding it (along with pansexual) very soon. We started with 100 entries (definitely not a comprehensive list…yet), and we are really excited to add entries as the community gives us feedback and suggestions.

We are really proud of the depth and breadth of terms that exist in the resource and hope it continues to be more and more useful as we add to it.

We’ll also be adding features so that this resource is the most useful for anyone using language about the LGBTQ+ community. If there are other words you can think of that we’ve left out, or ways to make the tool more dynamic, let us know and we’ll queue them up to be added!”

Read related myGwork articles here:

French Dictionary Includes Gender-Neutral Pronoun, Sparking Linguistic Debate

dictionary.com Adds More LGBT+ Words, But Will Use “Homosexuality” Less

Merriam-Webster Dictionary Has Updated ‘They’ To Include Nonbinary Pronoun