New NHS England rules for trans patients may lead to discrimination, assessment warns

Trans patients in England face increased risks of delayed treatment, “corridor care” and discrimination under new NHS England guidance on single‑sex hospital wards, according to an internal impact assessment reported by the Guardian.

The assessment examines how recently issued guidance on single‑sex accommodation affects people with protected characteristics under the Equality Act, including age, disability, sex and gender reassignment. The document concludes that the emphasis on “privacy, dignity and safety for men and women” and the alignment with current legal interpretations will benefit many patients, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, certain religious communities and minority ethnic groups.

The same report identifies a series of serious concerns for trans people. It notes “a number of potential adverse impacts for trans people” arising from the policy, which instructs trusts to allocate single‑sex wards, toilets and changing rooms by biological sex, not gender identity.

Under the guidance, trans patients are expected to be “accommodated in line with their biological sex” while staff safeguard privacy, dignity and safety for all patients. The impact assessment warns that this approach can have far‑reaching practical and psychological consequences.

Risks for trans patients

According to the document, trans people may:

• Experience delays in admission and a higher likelihood of “corridor care” if appropriate side rooms are unavailable, affecting both physical and mental health.
• Face discrimination or fear of discrimination when they are effectively “outed” as trans, either by being kept from wards aligned with their lived gender or by being moved to side rooms in ways that single them out.
• Be placed on wards aligned with biological sex when hospitals lack capacity in side rooms, creating distress and undermining their sense of safety and dignity.

The report also notes that some women whose appearance does not fit “general societal expectations” may be questioned about their sex before accessing women‑only wards, increasing the risk of invasive scrutiny and misgendering.

Impact on relations between patients and staff

The assessment warns that the new policy could harm relations between cisgender and transgender people in healthcare settings. Staff may need to balance requests and concerns from different groups of patients when allocating beds and facilities. This situation can create pressure, confusion and division in already stretched clinical environments.

The document recognises positive impacts for some groups and also records that trans people are likely to experience disadvantage when services rely strictly on biological sex. The updated code of practice from the Equality and Human Rights Commission states that services should use biological sex as the basis for access to single‑sex spaces and acknowledges that trans people are likely to be disadvantaged compared with people who are not trans.

The policy follows a 2025 UK Supreme Court ruling that interpreted the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act as referring only to biological women and biological sex, excluding transgender women with gender recognition certificates from that definition.

Mitigation measures and clinical priorities

The NHS England impact assessment sets out ways to reduce negative effects. It states that:

• Clinical need should always take priority in decisions on where to place patients.
• The requirement for same‑sex accommodation should not result in patients receiving “corridor care”.
• Placement decisions for trans patients should be made on a “case‑by‑case basis”, considering both clinical and safety needs.

The document also clarifies that the new ward policy does not apply in accident and emergency departments or intensive care units, where immediate clinical need governs placement.

NHS England declined to comment on the assessment when contacted.

Why this matters for the workplace

This policy debate reaches far beyond hospital walls. Employers and business leaders operate in a context shaped by national institutions and legal frameworks. When a major public body adopts rules that increase the risk of exclusion, anxiety and unequal treatment for trans people, many employees and customers pay attention.

For workplaces, this development highlights the importance of:

• Clear, explicit support for LGBTQ+ inclusion in policies and everyday practice.
• Training for managers and HR teams on the realities facing trans and non‑binary colleagues.
• Health and wellbeing strategies that recognise the additional barriers LGBTQ+ employees may face when accessing care.
• Partnerships with organisations that champion inclusion and provide practical tools and communities for LGBTQ+ professionals and allies.

Companies that want to send a strong signal of support for LGBTQ+ staff and customers can connect with dedicated inclusive business networks. For practical resources, role models and a global community committed to equality at work, leaders and professionals can sign up to myGwork and integrate that network into their broader diversity and inclusion strategy.

Interested in becoming a corporate member? Click here for more info.