Trump Judge Ends Biden’s LGBTQ+ Healthcare Protections
November 14, 2022In Texas, a Trump-appointed federal judge has ruled against the Biden administration’s healthcare protections for LGBTQ+ people.
President Joe Biden has been applying the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County – which made anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination illegal in the workplace – to other areas such as education and healthcare.
In the ruling, the Supreme Court found that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bans workplace discrimination “on the basis of sex,” applies to LGBTQ+ people because it is impossible to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity without taking sex into account.
Biden signed two executive orders that said federal agencies should “fully implement” the decision by applying the reasoning that anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination inherently involves sex discrimination. That led the US Department of Health and Human Services to announce it would apply Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act – which bans healthcare discrimination on the basis of sex – to LGBTQ+ people as well.
However, US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk has rejected that interpretation after two doctors sued, according to LGBTQ Nation. The doctors have been represented by former Trump advisor Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Foundation.
Kacsmaryk said that Section 1557 could explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity. Instead, it simply banned discrimination “on the basis of sex,” using the language put forth in Title IX – which bans discrimination in education. Kacsmaryk emphasised that the Bostock ruling applies only to workplaces. “Title IX’s ordinary public meaning remains intact until changed by Congress, or perhaps the Supreme Court.”
“For an action to occur ‘on the basis of sex,'” he added, “biological sex must be the motivating factor.”
LGBTQ+ healthcare protections have been in a tug of war for years. Rules released by the Obama administration provided those protections, but the Trump administration reversed them. Biden then reimplemented them through his interpretation of Bostock, though now they again hang in the balance.
In his ruling, the judge also managed to include an argument against allowing trans people to compete in sports as their gender, writing that the “reinterpretation of Title IX through the Notification imperils the opportunities for women Title IX was designed to promote and protect – categorically forcing biological women to compete against biological men.”
Read related myGwork articles here:
Biden Attacks Trans Health Care Bans: 'No State Should Be Able To Do That'
US Justice Department Challenges Alabama Law Criminalizing Trans Health Care For Minors
Idaho Republicans Βlock Cruel Bill Attacking Trans Health Care
Trump Administration Rolls Back Basic Obama-Era Trans Health Care Protections
Keep up to date with the latest myGnews